By Marcus Brookes, Head of Multi-Manager Team and Robin McDonald, Fund Manager at Schroders
• Nevertheless, we judge equity valuations from a longer-term perspective, particularly in the US, to be on the expensive side at present.
• A combination of factors has the potential to confound very low expectations for Europe next year.
“We remain very optimistic about future investment opportunities, just not present ones.”
“Almost irrespective of one’s economic outlook, the margin of safety in fixed income markets is wafer thin.”
We end 2014 with almost every asset class offering investors scant potential return for their risk. Five years into a period of unprecedented interest rate suppression, this should come as no surprise. The returns generated from every mainstream asset since 2009 have been striking. Those returns are now in the past. We believe the next few years will be characterised by lower returns, more volatility and greater risk.
We’re going to leave politics to one side for the purposes of this outlook. The economic backdrop is foggy enough! Suffice to say we will comment throughout the year on this particular risk factor.
To try and summarise consensus expectations for growth in 2015, we would say that investors are very optimistic about the US (yet still don’t believe the Federal Reserve (Fed) will raise rates) and to a lesser extent the UK, are willing to give Japan and much of Asia the benefit of the doubt for now (but are sceptical of China), and hate Europe full-stop.
Starting as we often do at the bottom, we think the combination of an expanding European Central Bank balance sheet, a gradual pick-up in credit growth due to record low funding costs for corporates and consumers, and the disposable income boost from lower oil prices has the potential to confound very low expectations for Europe next year.
Momentum in the US looks sustainable at least into 2015, meaning the Fed should follow through and begin raising rates. We’ll defer to our 2016 outlook for a judgment of how the economy absorbs what will likely be baby steps towards a tighter policy backdrop.
If US rate hikes don’t occur next year, the likely scapegoat will be a deflationary impulse emanating from China – the elephant that never leaves the room. The risks to China and other emerging markets will correlate highly with the strength of the US dollar in our view. Dollar bulls need to be careful what they wish for. A strong US currency, all else being equal, is not bullish for emerging market liquidity.
Not banking on bonds
Almost irrespective of one’s economic outlook, the margin of safety in fixed income markets is wafer thin. Aggregate yields globally are as low as they have ever been. Spreads are also closing in on their all-time tights. As a result, correlations within fixed income have picked up worryingly. Traditionally fixed income does not do well in a rising rate environment. If US rates do rise in 2015 as the Fed is telling us they are likely to, every fixed income asset class will take a hit. In spite of this, judging by the scale of continued inflows, the majority of investors appear comfortable with the risk/reward set-up. We’re not, and therefore have only limited exposure. By definition, prospective returns today are pretty much as low as they have ever been, risks are high and liquidity is terrible. Investors need to tread carefully here.
We have a healthy cash balance across our portfolios at present, with some diversification into US dollars. Cash is currently considered an inferior asset as it generates a zero return. We believe it will become more desirable as the market sets about discounting higher US interest rates.
Assuming global aggregate demand can continue to expand in 2015, we would have sympathy with the view that equities offer a greater short-term prospective return than fixed income. Nevertheless, we judge equity valuations from a longer-term perspective, particularly in the US, to be on the expensive side at present. This tells you next to nothing about their potential for 2015, but does indicate their vulnerability to disappointment. Like fixed income, from a positioning standpoint, investors appear very comfortable with the risk/reward trade-off in US equities. Once again, we’re less sanguine. What equity risk we are taking is predominantly outside of the US, favouring Europe and Japan particularly. Both markets have relative value on their side and the potential for a catch-up in profitability. In contrast, US equities trade at historically high multiples of historically high earnings. The emerging market complex also strikes us as vulnerable to disappointment and we have next to no exposure there.
Fertile ground for alternatives
Fortunately, we believe the environment is becoming ever more fertile for short-selling, allowing us to generate uncorrelated returns in what may otherwise prove a difficult backdrop for investors. This opportunity set extends beyond equities, to bonds and foreign exchange markets also. The faith investors have placed in the Fed this cycle has made shorting a largely unprofitable exercise. We expect this to change.
An opportunity to make money via short selling is presenting itself. This is something that we can take advantage of in our Alternatives allocation, through what we believe to be impending market corrections. This will not only to protect our investors capital, but indeed could deliver positive returns, by benefiting from a negatively correlated performance.
Using long/short strategies is something that the team has done for some time, and it accounts for the majority of our Alternatives holdings. Examples of current holdings in this space are Sanditon European Select Fund, Morgan Stanley Diversified Alpha Plus Fund and Majedie Tortoise Fund.
To take Morgan Stanley DAP, the ability to short allows it to behave as either a market neutral hedge fund or to be very directional. It is constructed with a macro-economic overview and has the capability to shift considerably as the investment landscape develops. Its flexibility to take outright long and short positions is a key reason for owning, as it allows for them to make money on the market anomalies, and specifically when markets are falling.
Raging bull market enters new phase
The bull market that began in March 2009 has been one of the most rewarding in history, yet the economic recovery to date has been one of the weakest. With the US economy now on a firmer footing, the Fed should intervene less in asset markets in 2015.
We remain very optimistic about future investment opportunities, just not present ones. For the time being we consider capital preservation the most prudent strategy for the portfolios. Indeed capital preservation is of great importance to the MM Diversity fund range, so the ability to target niche themes and benefit from over and under-valuations, across all asset classes is a very valuable tool. The current bias to capital preservation will change as the opportunity set evolves.
The views and opinions contained herein are those of Schroders’ Multi-Manager team and may not necessarily represent views expressed or reflected in other Schroders communications, strategies or funds.
The forecasts included should not be relied upon, are not guaranteed and are provided only as at the date of issue. Our forecasts are based on our own assumptions which may change. Forecasts and assumptions may be affected by external economic or other factors.
This document is intended to be for information purposes only and it is not intended as promotional material in any respect. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Ltd (Schroders) does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. This does not exclude or restrict any duty or liability that Schroders has to its customers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended from time to time) or any other regulatory system. Schroders has expressed its own views and opinions in this document and these may change. Reliance should not be placed on the views and information in the document when taking individual investment and/or strategic decisions.